On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 08:23:29AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 10/6/19 4:45 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Most of blk-mq drivers depend on managed IRQ's auto-affinity to setup
> > up queue mapping. Thomas mentioned the following point[1]:
> > 
> > "
> >  That was the constraint of managed interrupts from the very beginning:
> > 
> >   The driver/subsystem has to quiesce the interrupt line and the associated
> >   queue _before_ it gets shutdown in CPU unplug and not fiddle with it
> >   until it's restarted by the core when the CPU is plugged in again.
> > "
> > 
> > However, current blk-mq implementation doesn't quiesce hw queue before
> > the last CPU in the hctx is shutdown. Even worse, CPUHP_BLK_MQ_DEAD is
> > one cpuhp state handled after the CPU is down, so there isn't any chance
> > to quiesce hctx for blk-mq wrt. CPU hotplug.
> > 
> > Add new cpuhp state of CPUHP_AP_BLK_MQ_ONLINE for blk-mq to stop queues
> > and wait for completion of in-flight requests.
> > 
> > [1] 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/[email protected]/
> > 
> > Cc: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  block/blk-mq-tag.c         |  2 +-
> >  block/blk-mq-tag.h         |  2 ++
> >  block/blk-mq.c             | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/blk-mq.h     |  1 +
> >  include/linux/cpuhotplug.h |  1 +
> >  5 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> I really don't like the zillions of 'XXX_in_flight()' helper in blk-mq;
> blk_mq_queue_inflight(), blk_mq_in_flight(), blk_mq_in_flight_rw() et al.
> Can't you implement your one on top of the already existing?

This one returns in-flight rqs on specific tags(hctx), so far no such
kind of interface, that is why blk_mq_all_tag_busy_iter is exported out
in this patch.


Thanks,
Ming

Reply via email to