Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> These are micro-optimizations for synchronous I/O, which do not matter
> compared to all the other inefficiencies in the legacy buffer_head
> based mpage code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/mpage.c | 10 ----------
> 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/mpage.c b/fs/mpage.c
> index 0f8ae954a57903..124550cfac4a70 100644
> --- a/fs/mpage.c
> +++ b/fs/mpage.c
> @@ -269,11 +269,6 @@ static struct bio *do_mpage_readpage(struct
> mpage_readpage_args *args)
>
> alloc_new:
> if (args->bio == NULL) {
> - if (first_hole == blocks_per_page) {
> - if (!bdev_read_page(bdev, blocks[0] << (blkbits - 9),
> - &folio->page))
> - goto out;
> - }
> args->bio = bio_alloc(bdev, bio_max_segs(args->nr_pages), opf,
> gfp);
> if (args->bio == NULL)
> @@ -579,11 +574,6 @@ static int __mpage_writepage(struct page *page, struct
> writeback_control *wbc,
>
> alloc_new:
> if (bio == NULL) {
> - if (first_unmapped == blocks_per_page) {
> - if (!bdev_write_page(bdev, blocks[0] << (blkbits - 9),
> - page, wbc))
> - goto out;
> - }
> bio = bio_alloc(bdev, BIO_MAX_VECS,
> REQ_OP_WRITE | wbc_to_write_flags(wbc),
> GFP_NOFS);
> --
> 2.39.0
>
Makes sense,
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
