group_cpus_evenly distributes all present CPUs into groups. This ignores
the isolcpus configuration and assigns isolated CPUs into the groups.

Make group_cpus_evenly aware of isolcpus configuration and use the
housekeeping CPU mask as base for distributing the available CPUs into
groups.

Fixes: 11ea68f553e2 ("genirq, sched/isolation: Isolate from handling managed 
interrupts")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwag...@suse.de>
---
 lib/group_cpus.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/group_cpus.c b/lib/group_cpus.c
index ee272c4cefcc..713c9fdd774a 100644
--- a/lib/group_cpus.c
+++ b/lib/group_cpus.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/sort.h>
 #include <linux/group_cpus.h>
+#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 
@@ -330,7 +331,7 @@ static int __group_cpus_evenly(unsigned int startgrp, 
unsigned int numgrps,
 }
 
 /**
- * group_cpus_evenly - Group all CPUs evenly per NUMA/CPU locality
+ * group_possible_cpus_evenly - Group all CPUs evenly per NUMA/CPU locality
  * @numgrps: number of groups
  *
  * Return: cpumask array if successful, NULL otherwise. And each element
@@ -344,7 +345,7 @@ static int __group_cpus_evenly(unsigned int startgrp, 
unsigned int numgrps,
  * We guarantee in the resulted grouping that all CPUs are covered, and
  * no same CPU is assigned to multiple groups
  */
-struct cpumask *group_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps)
+static struct cpumask *group_possible_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps)
 {
        unsigned int curgrp = 0, nr_present = 0, nr_others = 0;
        cpumask_var_t *node_to_cpumask;
@@ -423,6 +424,76 @@ struct cpumask *group_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps)
        }
        return masks;
 }
+
+/**
+ * group_mask_cpus_evenly - Group all CPUs evenly per NUMA/CPU locality
+ * @numgrps: number of groups
+ * @cpu_mask: CPU to consider for the grouping
+ *
+ * Return: cpumask array if successful, NULL otherwise. And each element
+ * includes CPUs assigned to this group.
+ *
+ * Try to put close CPUs from viewpoint of CPU and NUMA locality into
+ * same group. Allocate present CPUs on these groups evenly.
+ */
+static struct cpumask *group_mask_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps,
+                                             const struct cpumask *cpu_mask)
+{
+       cpumask_var_t *node_to_cpumask;
+       cpumask_var_t nmsk;
+       int ret = -ENOMEM;
+       struct cpumask *masks = NULL;
+
+       if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&nmsk, GFP_KERNEL))
+               return NULL;
+
+       node_to_cpumask = alloc_node_to_cpumask();
+       if (!node_to_cpumask)
+               goto fail_nmsk;
+
+       masks = kcalloc(numgrps, sizeof(*masks), GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!masks)
+               goto fail_node_to_cpumask;
+
+       build_node_to_cpumask(node_to_cpumask);
+
+       ret = __group_cpus_evenly(0, numgrps, node_to_cpumask, cpu_mask, nmsk,
+                                 masks);
+
+fail_node_to_cpumask:
+       free_node_to_cpumask(node_to_cpumask);
+
+fail_nmsk:
+       free_cpumask_var(nmsk);
+       if (ret < 0) {
+               kfree(masks);
+               return NULL;
+       }
+       return masks;
+}
+
+/**
+ * group_cpus_evenly - Group all CPUs evenly per NUMA/CPU locality
+ * @numgrps: number of groups
+ *
+ * Return: cpumask array if successful, NULL otherwise.
+ *
+ * group_possible_cpus_evently() is used for distributing the cpus on all
+ * possible cpus in absence of isolcpus command line argument.
+ * group_mask_cpu_evenly() is used when the isolcpus command line
+ * argument is used with managed_irq option. In this case only the
+ * housekeeping CPUs are considered.
+ */
+struct cpumask *group_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps)
+{
+       const struct cpumask *hk_mask;
+
+       hk_mask = housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_IO_QUEUE);
+       if (!cpumask_empty(hk_mask))
+               return group_mask_cpus_evenly(numgrps, hk_mask);
+
+       return group_possible_cpus_evenly(numgrps);
+}
 #else /* CONFIG_SMP */
 struct cpumask *group_cpus_evenly(unsigned int numgrps)
 {

-- 
2.46.0


Reply via email to