On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 7:05 AM Benno Lossin <benno.los...@proton.me> wrote: > > On Mon Mar 24, 2025 at 10:59 PM CET, Tamir Duberstein wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 5:55 PM Benno Lossin <benno.los...@proton.me> wrote: > >> On Mon Mar 24, 2025 at 9:55 PM CET, Tamir Duberstein wrote: > >> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 4:16 PM Benno Lossin <benno.los...@proton.me> > >> > wrote: > >> >> * `cast_lossless` (maybe this catches some of the `num as int_type` > >> >> conversions I mentioned above) > >> > > >> > Yeah, suggested the same above. I had hoped this would deal with the > >> > char as u32 pattern but it did not. > >> > >> Aw that's a shame. Maybe we should create a clippy issue for that, > >> thoughts? > > > > Yeah, it's not clear to me why it isn't covered by `cast_lossless`. > > Might just be a bug. Want to file it? > > Done: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/14469
Nice, looks like there's already a PR out: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/14470. > >> >> I'll leave it up to you what you want to do with this: add it to this > >> >> series, make a new one, or let someone else handle it. If you don't want > >> >> to handle it, let me know, then I'll create a good-first-issue :) > >> > > >> > I'll add a patch for `cast_lossless` -- the rest should probably go > >> > into an issue. > >> > >> Do you mind filing the issue? Then you can decide yourself what you want > >> to do yourself vs what you want to leave for others. Feel free to copy > >> from my mail summary. > > > > Well, I don't really know what's left to do. We're pretty close at > > this point to having enabled everything but the nukes. Then there's > > the strict provenance thing, which I suppose we can write down. > > Yes, but there are also these from my original mail: > * `shared_ref as *const _` (for example in rust/kernel/uaccess.rs:247, > rust/kernel/str.rs:32 and rust/kernel/fs/file.rs:367), these we can > replace with `let ptr: *const ... = shared_ref;`. Don't know if there > is a clippy lint for this. I don't think we should go fixing things for which we don't have a clippy lint. That way lies madness, particularly as patches begin to be carried by other trees. > > And the other points (haven't taken a look at the other series you > submitted, so I don't know to what extend you fixed the other `as` casts > I mentioned). So I figured you might know which ones we still have after > applying all your patches :) > > --- > Cheers, > Benno >
