On Thu 23-10-25 12:46:45, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 10. 09. 25, 16:36, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > Validate extensible ioctls stricter than we do now.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >   fs/pidfs.c         |  2 +-
> >   include/linux/fs.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >   2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/pidfs.c b/fs/pidfs.c
> > index edc35522d75c..0a5083b9cce5 100644
> > --- a/fs/pidfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/pidfs.c
> > @@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ static bool pidfs_ioctl_valid(unsigned int cmd)
> >              * erronously mistook the file descriptor for a pidfd.
> >              * This is not perfect but will catch most cases.
> >              */
> > -           return (_IOC_TYPE(cmd) == _IOC_TYPE(PIDFD_GET_INFO));
> > +           return extensible_ioctl_valid(cmd, PIDFD_GET_INFO, 
> > PIDFD_INFO_SIZE_VER0);
> 
> Hi,
> 
> this turned EINVAL (from pidfd_info()) into ENOTTY (from pidfd_ioctl()) for
> at least LTP's:
> struct pidfd_info_invalid {
>       uint32_t dummy;
> };
> 
> #define PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT _IOWR(PIDFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 11, struct
> pidfd_info_invalid)
> 
> ioctl(pidfd, PIDFD_GET_INFO_SHORT, info_invalid) == EINVAL
> 
> at:
> https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/9bb94efa39bb1b08f37e56c7437db5fa13ddcae2/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_pidfd05.c#L46
> 
> Is this expected?

We already discussed this internally but for others the problem was
discussed here [1] and we decided the new errno value is OK and LTP test is
being fixed up.

                                                                Honza

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

-- 
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR

Reply via email to