Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> 于2025年11月28日周五 13:55写道: > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 11:22:49AM +0800, Stephen Zhang wrote: > > Therefore, we could potentially change it to:: > > > > if (bio->bi_status && !READ_ONCE(parent->bi_status)) > > parent->bi_status = bio->bi_status; > > > > But as you mentioned, the check might not be critical here. So ultimately, > > we can simplify it to: > > > > if (bio->bi_status) > > parent->bi_status = bio->bi_status; > > It might make sense to just use cmpxchg. See btrfs_bio_end_io as an > example (although it is operating on the btrfs_bio structure) >
Thanks for the suggestion! I learned something new today. Thanks, Shida
