The kublk mock ublk server allows multiple data copy mode arguments to
be passed on the command line (--zero_copy, --get_data, and --auto_zc).
The ublk device will be created with all the requested feature flags,
however kublk will only use one of the modes to interact with request
data (arbitrarily preferring auto_zc over zero_copy over get_data). To
clarify the intent of the test, don't allow multiple data copy modes to
be specified. --zero_copy and --auto_zc are allowed together for
--auto_zc_fallback, which uses both copy modes.
Don't set UBLK_F_USER_COPY for zero_copy, as it's a separate feature.
Fix the test cases in test_stress_05 passing --get_data along with
--zero_copy or --auto_zc.

Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <[email protected]>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c           | 11 ++++++++++-
 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_05.sh | 10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c
index f8fa102a627f..4dd02cb083ba 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c
@@ -1611,11 +1611,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
                        break;
                case 'd':
                        ctx.queue_depth = strtol(optarg, NULL, 10);
                        break;
                case 'z':
-                       ctx.flags |= UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY | 
UBLK_F_USER_COPY;
+                       ctx.flags |= UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY;
                        break;
                case 'r':
                        value = strtol(optarg, NULL, 10);
                        if (value)
                                ctx.flags |= UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY;
@@ -1684,10 +1684,19 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
                                "F_AUTO_BUF_REG nor F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY is 
enabled\n",
                                        __func__);
                return -EINVAL;
        }
 
+       if (!!(ctx.flags & UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA) +
+           !!(ctx.flags & UBLK_F_USER_COPY) +
+           (ctx.flags & UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY && !ctx.auto_zc_fallback) +
+           (ctx.flags & UBLK_F_AUTO_BUF_REG && !ctx.auto_zc_fallback) +
+           ctx.auto_zc_fallback > 1) {
+               fprintf(stderr, "too many data copy modes specified\n");
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
+
        i = optind;
        while (i < argc && ctx.nr_files < MAX_BACK_FILES) {
                ctx.files[ctx.nr_files++] = argv[i++];
        }
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_05.sh 
b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_05.sh
index 274295061042..68a194144302 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_05.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_05.sh
@@ -56,21 +56,21 @@ for reissue in $(seq 0 1); do
        wait
 done
 
 if _have_feature "ZERO_COPY"; then
        for reissue in $(seq 0 1); do
-               ublk_io_and_remove 8G -t null -q 4 -g -z -r 1 -i "$reissue" &
-               ublk_io_and_remove 256M -t loop -q 4 -g -z -r 1 -i "$reissue" 
"${UBLK_BACKFILES[1]}" &
+               ublk_io_and_remove 8G -t null -q 4 -z -r 1 -i "$reissue" &
+               ublk_io_and_remove 256M -t loop -q 4 -z -r 1 -i "$reissue" 
"${UBLK_BACKFILES[1]}" &
                wait
        done
 fi
 
 if _have_feature "AUTO_BUF_REG"; then
        for reissue in $(seq 0 1); do
-               ublk_io_and_remove 8G -t null -q 4 -g --auto_zc -r 1 -i 
"$reissue" &
-               ublk_io_and_remove 256M -t loop -q 4 -g --auto_zc -r 1 -i 
"$reissue" "${UBLK_BACKFILES[1]}" &
-               ublk_io_and_remove 8G -t null -q 4 -g -z --auto_zc 
--auto_zc_fallback -r 1 -i "$reissue" &
+               ublk_io_and_remove 8G -t null -q 4 --auto_zc -r 1 -i "$reissue" 
&
+               ublk_io_and_remove 256M -t loop -q 4 --auto_zc -r 1 -i 
"$reissue" "${UBLK_BACKFILES[1]}" &
+               ublk_io_and_remove 8G -t null -q 4 -z --auto_zc 
--auto_zc_fallback -r 1 -i "$reissue" &
                wait
        done
 fi
 
 if _have_feature "PER_IO_DAEMON"; then
-- 
2.45.2


Reply via email to