From: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>

The comment was not correct about the part where it says the endio
callback of the bio might have not yet been called - update it
to mention that by that time the endio callback execution might
still be in progress only.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 855935f..a21ad34 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -4989,8 +4989,9 @@ static void evict_inode_truncate_pages(struct inode 
*inode)
        /*
         * Keep looping until we have no more ranges in the io tree.
         * We can have ongoing bios started by readpages (called from readahead)
-        * that didn't get their end io callbacks called yet or they are still
-        * in progress ((extent_io.c:end_bio_extent_readpage()). This means some
+        * that have their endio callback (extent_io.c:end_bio_extent_readpage)
+        * still in progress (unlocked the pages in the bio but did not yet
+        * unlocked the ranges in the io tree). Therefore this means some
         * ranges can still be locked and eviction started because before
         * submitting those bios, which are executed by a separate task (work
         * queue kthread), inode references (inode->i_count) were not taken
-- 
2.1.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to