On Friday 02 May 2008, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 10:34:07AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > > Thanks, but this uses CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR which isn't enough to tell > > if the kernel has the patch. Lets go back to Jeff's suse patch: > > Do we really need to support kernels compiled with the apparmour patch > applied but not enabled? That would be a custom kernel build, and I get > the impression that people Just Don't Do That -- if they want a newer > kernel, they fetch one from kernel.org. Maybe I'm wrong though.
Yeah, if there's no better test I'll just use the one for the apparmor config (and stop spamming l-k with this btrfs specific stuff). -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
