On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 22:45 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 02:21:09PM -0400, Chris Mason ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > > Sure it is interesting as studing anything new, but there is nothing in > > > advfs which can prevent btrfs from success. Virtually nothing. > > > Advfs is quite old technology built on top of almost 20 years old ideas > > > and hardware, while the former can still be (and likely is) valid, > > > hardware made significant progress. > > > > In general, the rules that make filesystems go haven't changed in a long > > time. Disks are slow, ram is faster, and cpu is both infinitely fast > > and important to share with other things running on the hardware. > > I believe if things are that simple, you would not start btrfs? :) >
Grin, just because everyone knows the rules doesn't mean you shouldn't try playing. SSD does change the dynamics as well in ways that I think btrfs is best suited to handle. The idea is that well established filesystems can teach us quite a lot about layout, and about the optimizations that were added in response to customer demand. Having the code to these optimizations is very useful. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
