Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Started interactively? I'm not entirely sure what that means, but in > general when you ask the user a question about if/how to fix a > corruption, they will have no idea what the correct answer is.
While that's true today, I'm not sure it has to be true always. I always thought traditional fsck user interfaces were a UI desaster and could be done much better with some simple tweaks. For example the fsck could present the user a list of files that ended up in lost+found and let them examine them, instead of asking a lot of useless questions. Or it could give a high level summary on how many files in which part of the directory tree were corrupted. etc.etc. Or it could default to a high level mode that only gives such high level information to the user. So I don't think all corruptions could be done perfectly user friendly, but at least the basic user friendliness in many situations could be much improved. -Andi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
