>> In my opinon, the whole thing comes up from the idea of using cheap hardware >> and out-of-the-box configurations to keep promises of reliability and >> availability which are not realistic. There is a reason why there are more >> expensive HDDs, RAIDs, SANs with volume mirroring, multipathing and so on. >> Simply ignoring the fact that you have to use the proper tools to address >> specific problems and pray to the toothfairy to put a >> solve-all-my-problems-fs under your pillow is no solution. I'd rather have a >> solid fs with deterministic behavior and some state-of-the-art features.
SvK> Well, sorry to say, but I begin to sound a bit like Joseph Stiglitz SvK> trying to explain why neoliberalism does not work out. SvK> Please accept that this world is full of failure of all kinds. If you deny SvK> that all your models and ideas will only be failures, too. SvK> All I am saying is that we should accept that dead sectors, braindead SvK> firmware-programmers, production in jungle-environment, transportation in SvK> rough areas, high temperatures, high humidity, harddisks that have no disks SvK> and so on are facts of live. And only a childs answer can be : "oops" SvK> (sorry could not resist this one ;-) +1000 Systems should survive and function or it's dead - like in nature. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
