On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:50:50 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijls...@chello.nl> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 11:36 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Do people enable CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG? > > Well, I have it always enabled, but I've honestly no idea if that makes > me weird. It'd be weird if you're not weird. > > CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=n, CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y is getting to be a pretty > > small subset? > > Could be, do you fancy me doing a sysctl? shouldn't be hard. The /sys/debug knob depends upon CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG, I assume? umm, yes, I do think that it would be prudent to make this control unconditionally available. Experience tells us that any regressions which this change causes could take a long time to turn up - sometimes years. By which time the people who are reporting the regressions are running packaged kernels, and if that packaged kernel didn't enable CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG, we're a bit screwed. Did we end up deciding to remove the CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=n dependency? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
