On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:04:08AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: >On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:12 +0800, Américo Wang wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:03:37AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: >> >On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:57:32PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote: >> >> >> >> I found userspace tool, btrfsctl, uses BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX, and >> >> it also looks that this one is more proper. >> >> >> >> Kill BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX since no one will use it. >> >> >> > >> >Nope, BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX is specifically used for the ioctl stuff, makes >> >the >> >arguments 4k aligned, this patch is incorrect. Thanks, >> >> Ok, then what is BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX? :) > >Right now it is only used in the progs. The disk format doesn't really >have a max there, it is just to keep names usable. But, we should add a >check in the kernel ioctl side, are you interested in sending a patch >for it? >
Yup, I will do. Thanks. -- "Against stupidity, the gods themselves, contend in vain." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
