Daniel J Blueman <[email protected]> wrote: > There is good chance that the BTRFS kmemleak reports using 2.6.31-rc6 > [1] are false-positives, due to the overwriting of the static pointers > [2]. Does this ring true with anyone else?
If you do a few echo scan > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak, do they disappear? The static pointers are scanned by kmemleak, unless they are in the .data.init section (which is removed anyway). -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
