__tree_search() returns the reverse result about the prev node and the next 
node. And we can
get the prev node and the next node directly by rb_prev() and rb_next(), so it 
is unnecessary
to use while loop to get them.

This patch fixes this bug of the wrong result.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <[email protected]>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_map.c |   13 ++++---------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
index 46bea0f..16744f4 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
@@ -136,20 +136,15 @@ static struct rb_node *__tree_search(struct rb_root 
*root, u64 offset,
 
        if (prev_ret) {
                orig_prev = prev;
-               while (prev && offset >= extent_map_end(prev_entry)) {
-                       prev = rb_next(prev);
-                       prev_entry = rb_entry(prev, struct extent_map, rb_node);
-               }
+               if (prev && offset < prev_entry->start)
+                       prev = rb_prev(prev);
                *prev_ret = prev;
                prev = orig_prev;
        }
 
        if (next_ret) {
-               prev_entry = rb_entry(prev, struct extent_map, rb_node);
-               while (prev && offset < prev_entry->start) {
-                       prev = rb_prev(prev);
-                       prev_entry = rb_entry(prev, struct extent_map, rb_node);
-               }
+               if (prev && offset >= extent_map_end(prev_entry))
+                       prev = rb_next(prev);
                *next_ret = prev;
        }
        return NULL;
-- 
1.6.5.2


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to