I also want to know why this conversion is needed. This might be a typo, I think.
Could someone tell us why? Can we fix this conversion? Or shouldn't we fix it considering back-compatibility? Regards, taruisi (2009/11/11 15:16), Gong, Zhipeng wrote: > We'd like to use btrfsctl in a shell script, however, btrfsctl exit with 1 > even if the operation is successful, which is opposite to the usual shell > command convention. > Why btrfsctl add this conversion in the end? > if (ret) > exit(0); > else > exit(1); > > Thanks > Zhipeng > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
