On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:46 PM, jim owens <jow...@hp.com> wrote: > but it is the only method > that can remain accurate under the mixed raid modes possible > on a per-file-basis in btrfs.
can you clarify, then, the intention/goal behind cmason's "df is lying. The total bytes in the FS include all 4 drives. I need to fix up the math for the total available space." Is the goal NOT to accurately represent the actual available space? Seems rather odd that users are simply to know/accept that "available space" in btrfs RAID-10 != "available space" in md RIAD-10 ... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
