On 1 Feb 2010, at 15:19, Josef Bacik wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:17:24AM +0100, Thomas Kupper wrote: >> >> On 31 Jan 2010, at 09:46, Thomas Kupper wrote: >> >>> On 30 Jan 2010, at 19:20, Josef Bacik wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 05:57:49PM +0100, Thomas Kupper wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 30 Jan 2010, at 16:18, Josef Bacik wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:43:45PM +0100, Thomas Kupper wrote: >>>>>>> Just a short question: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How can I check the data and metadata modes of a multi-device btrfs >>>>>>> device? btrfs-show is of no help and df is still not showing the >>>>>>> correct size of it either (using latest btrfs kernel module and btrfs >>>>>>> tools). >>>>>> >>>>>> There are patches to do this for you, look for the "-i" patch for >>>>>> btrfs-progs >>>>>> and the "df" patch for the kernel, that will give you the information >>>>>> you are >>>>>> looking for. Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Josef >> [...] >>>> >>>> This is the btrfs-progs patch >>>> >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg03808.html >>>> >>>> and this is the kernel patch you'll want >>>> >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg03807.html >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Josef >>> >>> Josef, do you have a user space app which uses the new IOCTL? df is using, >>> right? >> >> Typo: it should have written -> "df isn't using it, right?" >> > > Right df isn't using it, just btrfsctl -i uses it. I just called the patch > "df" > for lack of a better description for what it does. Thanks, >
Right, I lost the overview over the patches for a moment after playing around with a bunch of 'em. And then missed the -i patch. Now's working excellent. > Josef Thanks, Thomas-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
