On Friday 26 March 2010, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 09:22:07PM +0100, Dipl.-Ing. Michael Niederle wrote:
> > Hi, Chris!
> >
> > > Add an optional timestamp field to filter
> > > files that have changed since a given timestamp.
> >
> > Is there a possibility to derive the timestamp directly from the
generation
> > number?
>
> I'm afraid not.
>
> >
> > If we have a "-e"-switch for printing extent-information we could also
have
> > another switch to decide whether to print directory-information or not and
> > combine find-new and find-modified into a single command.
>
> Yes, that's the direction I'd like to see.
>
> >
> > Meanwhile I have implemented the (very simple) command
> >
> > btrfs subvolume max-gen <path>
> > Print the highest generation number in a filesystem.
> >
It is possible to combine the commands max-gen and find-new ? Something like:
$ btrfs subvol find-new subvol1 snap1
I think that the generation number is useful only from a developer point of
view. But from an user point of view a command which is able to compare two
snapshot if more useful.
>
> Great.
>
> -chris
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
gpg key@ keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (ghigo) <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint = 4769 7E51 5293 D36C 814E C054 BF04 F161 3DC5 0512
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
