"ret" was used in a confusing way because instead of returning "ret" we
returned the opposite of ret.  I refactored it.  Also if ret is non-zero
in the new code then entry is clearly non-null so I removed that check.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
index e56c72b..0a37019 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
@@ -270,13 +270,13 @@ int btrfs_dec_test_ordered_pending(struct inode *inode,
        spin_lock(&tree->lock);
        node = tree_search(tree, file_offset);
        if (!node) {
-               ret = 1;
+               ret = 0;
                goto out;
        }
 
        entry = rb_entry(node, struct btrfs_ordered_extent, rb_node);
        if (!offset_in_entry(entry, file_offset)) {
-               ret = 1;
+               ret = 0;
                goto out;
        }
 
@@ -286,17 +286,19 @@ int btrfs_dec_test_ordered_pending(struct inode *inode,
                       (unsigned long long)io_size);
        }
        entry->bytes_left -= io_size;
-       if (entry->bytes_left == 0)
+       if (entry->bytes_left == 0) {
                ret = test_and_set_bit(BTRFS_ORDERED_IO_DONE, &entry->flags);
-       else
-               ret = 1;
+               ret = !ret;
+       } else {
+               ret = 0;
+       }
 out:
-       if (!ret && cached && entry) {
+       if (ret && cached) {
                *cached = entry;
                atomic_inc(&entry->refs);
        }
        spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
-       return ret == 0;
+       return ret;
 }
 
 /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to