Allow users to delete the snapshots/subvols they own.  When CAP_SYS_ADMIN
is not present, require that

 - the user has write and exec permission on the parent directory
 - security_inode_rmdir() doesn't object
 - the user has write and exec permission on the subvol directory
 - the user owns the subvol directory
 - the directory and subvol append flags are not set

This is a bit more strict than the requirements for 'rm -f subvol/*',
which is allowed with just 'wx' on non-owned non-sticky dirs.  It is less
strict than 'rmdir subvol', which has additional requirements if the parent
directory is sticky.  It is less strict than 'rm -rf subvol', which would
require scanning the entire subvol to ensure all content is deletable.

Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <s...@newdream.net>
---
 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c    |   27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 security/security.c |    1 +
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 9cbda86..90d2871 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -1288,9 +1288,6 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(struct file 
*file,
        int ret;
        int err = 0;
 
-       if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
-               return -EPERM;
-
        vol_args = memdup_user(arg, sizeof(*vol_args));
        if (IS_ERR(vol_args))
                return PTR_ERR(vol_args);
@@ -1325,6 +1322,30 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(struct file 
*file,
                goto out_dput;
        }
 
+       /*
+        * Allow subvol deletion if we own the subvol and we would
+        * (approximately) be allowed to rmdir it.  Strictly speaking,
+        * we could possibly delete everything with fewer permissions,
+        * or might require more permissions to remove all files
+        * contained by the subvol, but we aren't trying to mimic
+        * directory semantics perfectly.
+        */
+       if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
+               err = inode_permission(dir, MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC);
+               if (err)
+                       goto out_dput;
+               err = security_inode_rmdir(dir, dentry);
+               if (err)
+                       goto out_dput;
+               err = inode_permission(inode, MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC);
+               if (err)
+                       goto out_dput;
+               err = -EPERM;
+               if (inode->i_uid != current_fsuid() || IS_APPEND(dir) ||
+                   IS_APPEND(inode))
+                       goto out_dput;
+       }
+
        dest = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
 
        mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index c53949f..1c980ee 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -490,6 +490,7 @@ int security_inode_rmdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry 
*dentry)
                return 0;
        return security_ops->inode_rmdir(dir, dentry);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(security_inode_rmdir);
 
 int security_inode_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int mode, 
dev_t dev)
 {
-- 
1.6.6.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to