On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 05:10:57PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:05:52PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > On 11/16/10 10:38 PM, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > >> as for the locking problems ... sorry about that!
> > >
> > > That's no problem. So is that an ack? :)
> > >
> >
> > I'd like to test it with the original case it was supposed to solve; will
> > do that tomorrow.
>
> OK, but it shouldn't make much difference, unless there is a lot of
> strange activity happening on the sb (like mount / umount / remount /
> freeze / etc).
This makes sense to me as well.
Acked-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <ty...@mit.edu>
So how do we want to send this patch to Linus? It's a writeback
change, so through some mm tree? Or it lives in fs/fs-writeback.c
(which I always thought was weird; why is it not in mm/?), so maybe
through the VFS tree, even though I don't think Al would really care
about this patch.
Or I can push it to Linus through the ext4 tree....
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
