On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:08:15AM -0800, Andy Isaacson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 08:29:12PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > > > [50010.838804] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > > [50010.838931] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:1616! > > > [50010.839053] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP > [snip] > > > [50010.839653] Pid: 1681, comm: btrfs-endio-wri Not tainted 2.6.37 #1 > > > > Could you please pull from the master branch of the btrfs unstable tree. > > We had a late fix that is related to this. > > I saw BUG at inode.c:1616 while running 2.6.37-rc6-11882-g55ec86f, I saw
Just got this again, same BUG and same stack trace. This machine + fs ran great for several months under approximately the same workload, but the FS is slowly filling up; is this a regression in .37 or is the bug a function of the FS load? -andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
