Lol :) You can't use labels for the decryption, because an encrypted device has no label, it doesn't even have a filesystem and you can't say if there are any kind of data on it (in my case) :)
You can use labels after you have decrypted the device. Then I'm using labels, too. But that doesn't help with this problem :) Regards, Felix On 24. January 2011 - 08:42, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Date: 24 Jan 2011 08:42:00 +0100 > From: Helmut Hullen <hul...@t-online.de> > To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: Bug in mkfs.btrfs?! > > Hallo, Felix, > > Du meintest am 24.01.11: > > > Sorry that I didn't saw that earlier. If I would use /dev/sdxx > > instead of /dev/disk/by-id/ for decrypting the devices it would be > > working. But those ids didn't change if I remove/add a device, so it > > would be nice to be able to use those ids. > > I prefer working with LABELs. They can be short and self explaining. > > Viele Gruesse! > Helmut > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ---end quoted text--- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
