In btrfs_get_block_direct we call btrfs_get_extent to lookup the extent for the
range that we are looking for.  If we don't find an extent, btrfs_get_extent
will insert a extent_map for that area and mark it as a hole.  So it does the
job of allocating a new extent map and inserting it into the io tree.  But if
we're creating a new extent we free it up and redo all of that work.  So instead
pass the em to btrfs_new_extent_direct(), and if it will work just allocate the
disk space and set it up properly and bypass the freeing/allocating of a new
extent map and the expensive operation of inserting the thing into the io_tree.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 93ed346..032e8fb 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -5443,17 +5443,30 @@ out:
 }
 
 static struct extent_map *btrfs_new_extent_direct(struct inode *inode,
+                                                 struct extent_map *em,
                                                  u64 start, u64 len)
 {
        struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
        struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
-       struct extent_map *em;
        struct extent_map_tree *em_tree = &BTRFS_I(inode)->extent_tree;
        struct btrfs_key ins;
        u64 alloc_hint;
        int ret;
+       bool insert = false;
 
-       btrfs_drop_extent_cache(inode, start, start + len - 1, 0);
+       /*
+        * Ok if the extent map we looked up is a hole and is for the exact
+        * range we want, there is no reason to allocate a new one, however if
+        * it is not right then we need to free this one and drop the cache for
+        * our range.
+        */
+       if (em->block_start != EXTENT_MAP_HOLE || em->start != start ||
+           em->len != len) {
+               free_extent_map(em);
+               em = NULL;
+               insert = true;
+               btrfs_drop_extent_cache(inode, start, start + len - 1, 0);
+       }
 
        trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root, 0);
        if (IS_ERR(trans))
@@ -5469,10 +5482,12 @@ static struct extent_map 
*btrfs_new_extent_direct(struct inode *inode,
                goto out;
        }
 
-       em = alloc_extent_map(GFP_NOFS);
        if (!em) {
-               em = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-               goto out;
+               em = alloc_extent_map(GFP_NOFS);
+               if (!em) {
+                       em = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+                       goto out;
+               }
        }
 
        em->start = start;
@@ -5482,9 +5497,15 @@ static struct extent_map *btrfs_new_extent_direct(struct 
inode *inode,
        em->block_start = ins.objectid;
        em->block_len = ins.offset;
        em->bdev = root->fs_info->fs_devices->latest_bdev;
+
+       /*
+        * We need to do this because if we're using the original em we searched
+        * for, we could have EXTENT_FLAG_VACANCY set, and we don't want that.
+        */
+       em->flags = 0;
        set_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_PINNED, &em->flags);
 
-       while (1) {
+       while (insert) {
                write_lock(&em_tree->lock);
                ret = add_extent_mapping(em_tree, em);
                write_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
@@ -5702,8 +5723,7 @@ must_cow:
         * it above
         */
        len = bh_result->b_size;
-       free_extent_map(em);
-       em = btrfs_new_extent_direct(inode, start, len);
+       em = btrfs_new_extent_direct(inode, em, start, len);
        if (IS_ERR(em))
                return PTR_ERR(em);
        len = min(len, em->len - (start - em->start));
-- 
1.7.2.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to