On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 03:34:57PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> Excerpts from Christoph Hellwig's message of 2011-04-15 15:24:12 -0400:
> > Sorry, but this is too ugly to live.  If the reason for this really is
> > good enough we'll just need to push the filemap_write_and_wait_range
> > and i_mutex locking into every ->fsync instance.
> > 
> 
> Which part is too ugly to live?  The special op? New parameters?

Two different fsync ops, when we could triviall do with one by pushing
things down.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to