On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 03:34:57PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> Excerpts from Christoph Hellwig's message of 2011-04-15 15:24:12 -0400:
> > Sorry, but this is too ugly to live.  If the reason for this really is
> > good enough we'll just need to push the filemap_write_and_wait_range
> > and i_mutex locking into every ->fsync instance.
> > 
> Which part is too ugly to live?  The special op? New parameters?

Two different fsync ops, when we could triviall do with one by pushing
things down.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to