On 06/21/2011 04:49 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
If a inode is a BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM one, it need not to look for csum items
any more.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo<[email protected]>
---
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
index 6193e27..1eca1d4 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -2672,7 +2672,8 @@ static noinline int copy_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle
*trans,
struct inode *inode,
struct btrfs_path *dst_path,
struct extent_buffer *src,
- int start_slot, int nr, int inode_only)
+ int start_slot, int nr, int inode_only,
+ int csum)
Don't add another parameter, we're already passing in the inode, just
check for nodatasum in copy_items instead of making all the callers do
it. Thanks,
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
