While truncating free space cache, we forget to change trans->block_rsv
back to the original one, but leave it with the orphan_block_rsv, and
then with option inode_cache enable, it leads to countless warnings of
btrfs_alloc_free_block and btrfs_orphan_commit_root:

WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5711 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0x180/0x350 
[btrfs]()
...
WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2193 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xb0/0xc0 [btrfs]()

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <[email protected]>
---
 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c |    4 ++++
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
index 6a265b9..41ac927 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
@@ -190,9 +190,11 @@ int btrfs_truncate_free_space_cache(struct btrfs_root 
*root,
                                    struct btrfs_path *path,
                                    struct inode *inode)
 {
+       struct btrfs_block_rsv *rsv;
        loff_t oldsize;
        int ret = 0;
 
+       rsv = trans->block_rsv;
        trans->block_rsv = root->orphan_block_rsv;
        ret = btrfs_block_rsv_check(trans, root,
                                    root->orphan_block_rsv,
@@ -210,6 +212,8 @@ int btrfs_truncate_free_space_cache(struct btrfs_root *root,
         */
        ret = btrfs_truncate_inode_items(trans, root, inode,
                                         0, BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY);
+
+       trans->block_rsv = rsv;
        if (ret) {
                WARN_ON(1);
                return ret;
-- 
1.6.5.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to