Hi Josef,
after a quick test it seems that I do not hit this Warning any longer.
But I got a new one.
[ 5241.839951] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 5241.839974] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5715
btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xac/0x330 [btrfs]()
[ 5241.839979] Hardware name: MS-96B3
[ 5241.839982] Modules linked in: radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm
i2c_algo_bit psmouse k8temp sp5100_tco edac_core edac_mce_amd serio_raw
shpchp i2c_piix4 lp parport ahci pata_atiixp libahci btrfs e1000e
zlib_deflate libcrc32c
[ 5241.840068] Pid: 1568, comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G W
3.1.0-rc6 #1
[ 5241.840072] Call Trace:
[ 5241.840084] [<ffffffff81063d0f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
[ 5241.840101] [<ffffffff81063d6a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
[ 5241.840133] [<ffffffffa002a9cc>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xac/0x330
[btrfs]
[ 5241.840152] [<ffffffff8110d35a>] ? unlock_page+0x2a/0x40
[ 5241.840188] [<ffffffffa0059268>] ? read_extent_buffer+0xa8/0x180 [btrfs]
[ 5241.840222] [<ffffffffa0031c00>] ? verify_parent_transid+0x160/0x160
[btrfs]
[ 5241.840252] [<ffffffffa001a0d2>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x122/0x4b0 [btrfs]
[ 5241.840283] [<ffffffffa001a552>] btrfs_cow_block+0xf2/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[ 5241.840314] [<ffffffffa001cb88>] push_leaf_left+0x108/0x180 [btrfs]
[ 5241.840344] [<ffffffffa001fb78>] btrfs_del_items+0x2b8/0x440 [btrfs]
[ 5241.840379] [<ffffffffa00300c2>] btrfs_del_csums+0x2d2/0x310 [btrfs]
[ 5241.840415] [<ffffffffa00677a8>] ? btrfs_tree_unlock+0x28/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 5241.840447] [<ffffffffa002597a>] __btrfs_free_extent+0x48a/0x6f0 [btrfs]
[ 5241.840480] [<ffffffffa0028c8d>] run_clustered_refs+0x21d/0x840 [btrfs]
[ 5241.840514] [<ffffffffa002937a>] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xca/0x220
[btrfs]
[ 5241.840551] [<ffffffffa0053576>] ?
btrfs_run_ordered_operations+0x1d6/0x200 [btrfs]
[ 5241.840587] [<ffffffffa0038fa3>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x83/0x870
[btrfs]
[ 5241.840605] [<ffffffff81012871>] ? __switch_to+0x261/0x2f0
[ 5241.840622] [<ffffffff81086d70>] ? wake_up_bit+0x40/0x40
[ 5241.840656] [<ffffffffa0039790>] ?
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x870/0x870 [btrfs]
[ 5241.840691] [<ffffffffa00397af>] do_async_commit+0x1f/0x30 [btrfs]
[ 5241.840708] [<ffffffff8108110d>] process_one_work+0x11d/0x430
[ 5241.840724] [<ffffffff81081dd9>] worker_thread+0x169/0x360
[ 5241.840741] [<ffffffff81081c70>] ? manage_workers.clone.21+0x240/0x240
[ 5241.840758] [<ffffffff81086616>] kthread+0x96/0xa0
[ 5241.840775] [<ffffffff815f2434>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 5241.840792] [<ffffffff81086580>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0
[ 5241.840808] [<ffffffff815f2430>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
[ 5241.840819] ---[ end trace c8a580615cad6cb5 ]---
Best Regards,
Martin
Am 15.09.2011 21:50, schrieb Josef Bacik:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:44:09AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Liu Bo wrote:
On 09/11/2011 05:47 AM, Martin Mailand wrote:
Hi
I am hitting this Warning reproducible, the workload is a ceph osd,
kernel ist 3.1.0-rc5.
Have posted a patch for this:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=131547325515336&w=2
We're still seeing this with -rc6, which includes 98c9942 and 65450aa.
I haven't looked at the reservation code in much detail. Is there
anything I can do to help track this down?
This should be taken care of with all my enospc changes. You can pull them down
from my btrfs-work tree as soon as kernel.org comes back from the dead :).
Thanks,
Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
