On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 08:59:47AM -0500, Jeff Putney wrote: > Further adoption and more commitment from Oracle for production use is > good news. The fact that adoption is happening without a working fsck > seems to indicate that folks have given up waiting for it.
No, in this case it means we're confident it will get rolled out. > > Not hearing anything about getting the source into the repositories is > terrible news by omission. It seems like doubling down on maintaining > a single point of failure. Having a firm date of when the source > repository will be released regardless of its condition, or > functionality, would go a long way to appeasing the concerns within > the user base. I've given a number of hard dates recently and I'd prefer to show up with the code instead. I don't think it makes sense to put a partial implementation out there, we'll just have a bunch of people reporting problems that I know exist. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
