run_ordered_completions has no error conditions and should return void.
Its callers already ignore the error code anyway.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <je...@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
@@ -174,11 +174,11 @@ out:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workers->lock, flags);
}
-static noinline int run_ordered_completions(struct btrfs_workers *workers,
+static noinline void run_ordered_completions(struct btrfs_workers *workers,
struct btrfs_work *work)
{
if (!workers->ordered)
- return 0;
+ return;
set_bit(WORK_DONE_BIT, &work->flags);
@@ -216,7 +216,6 @@ static noinline int run_ordered_completi
}
spin_unlock(&workers->order_lock);
- return 0;
}
static void put_worker(struct btrfs_worker_thread *worker)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
