Btrfsck report error 100 after the 83th case of xfstests was run, it means the i_size of the file is wrong.
The reason of this bug is that: Btrfs increased i_size of the file at the beginning, but it failed to expand the file, and failed to update the i_size to the old size because there is no enough space in the file system, so we found a wrong i_size. This patch fixes this bug by updating the i_size just when we pass the file expanding and get enough space to update i-node. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <[email protected]> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 960818b..f1c4bce 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -3373,6 +3373,8 @@ int btrfs_cont_expand(struct inode *inode, loff_t oldsize, loff_t size) static int btrfs_setsize(struct inode *inode, loff_t newsize) { + struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root; + struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans; loff_t oldsize = i_size_read(inode); int ret; @@ -3380,16 +3382,20 @@ static int btrfs_setsize(struct inode *inode, loff_t newsize) return 0; if (newsize > oldsize) { - i_size_write(inode, newsize); - btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, i_size_read(inode), NULL); truncate_pagecache(inode, oldsize, newsize); ret = btrfs_cont_expand(inode, oldsize, newsize); - if (ret) { - btrfs_setsize(inode, oldsize); + if (ret) return ret; - } - mark_inode_dirty(inode); + trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 1); + if (IS_ERR(trans)) + return PTR_ERR(trans); + + i_size_write(inode, newsize); + btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, i_size_read(inode), NULL); + ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, inode); + + btrfs_end_transaction_throttle(trans, root); } else { /* -- 1.7.6.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
