On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 07:28:18PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -2104,6 +2104,14 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
>               err = -EINVAL;
>               goto fail_alloc;
>       }
> +     if (btrfs_super_sectorsize(disk_super) > PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) {
> +             printk(KERN_ERR "BTRFS: couldn't mount because sectorsize(%d)"
> +                    " was larger than PAGE_SIZE(%lu)\n",

%llu

> +                    btrfs_super_sectorsize(disk_super),
> +                    (unsigned long long)PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
> +             err = -EINVAL;
> +             goto fail_alloc;
> +     }
>  
>       features = btrfs_super_incompat_flags(disk_super);
>       features |= BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_BACKREF;

We have the opposite check a few lines below

2257         if (sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE) {
2258                 printk(KERN_WARNING "btrfs: Incompatible sector size "
2259                        "found on %s\n", sb->s_id);
2260                 goto fail_sb_buffer;
2261         }
2262

so sectorsize must be equal to PAGE_SIZE always and one check can catch
both cases.


david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to