Actually, scratch that one.

Sorry,
-Jan

On 27.04.2012 17:03, Jan Schmidt wrote:
> We had the following code in push_node_left:
> 
>       x = min(y, x);
>         if (x < y) {
>               /* confusing comment here */
>               ...
>       }
> 
> That if's condition can't become true, so just kill the entire block. Plus:
> no one will ever need to worry about the removed confusing comment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/ctree.c |   14 ++------------
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> index e801f22..0d2f4e5 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> @@ -1999,19 +1999,9 @@ static int push_node_left(struct btrfs_trans_handle 
> *trans,
>       if (push_items <= 0)
>               return 1;
>  
> -     if (empty) {
> +     if (empty)
>               push_items = min(src_nritems, push_items);

(still, adding an else path with "push_items = src_nritems" would have
been much more obvious)

> -             if (push_items < src_nritems) {
> -                     /* leave at least 8 pointers in the node if
> -                      * we aren't going to empty it
> -                      */
> -                     if (src_nritems - push_items < 8) {
> -                             if (push_items <= 8)
> -                                     return 1;
> -                             push_items -= 8;
> -                     }
> -             }
> -     } else
> +     else
>               push_items = min(src_nritems - 8, push_items);
>  
>       copy_extent_buffer(dst, src,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to