Hello Liu,

thanks, you are so right. I just got it exactly the wrong way (I read
btrfs-progs-unstable and thought this must be the bleeding edge one
;-). I should have read your e-Mail before.
I will revise it asap. But I have to let it wait for tomorrow... Gotta
sleep now.

Best Regards,
Alex


2012/7/31 Liu Bo <liubo2...@cn.fujitsu.com>:
> On 07/31/2012 08:53 AM, Alexander Karbstein wrote:
>
>> The command btrfs subvolume set-default 0 /path/to/fs changed the
>> default subvolume to whatever subvolume was currently mounted on
>> /path/to/fs. This patch changes this behaviour to set the default
>> subvolume to BTRFS_FS_TREE_OBJECTID in case the user asks for
>> subvolid=0
>>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Karbstein <alexander.karbst...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  btrfs_cmds.c |    5 +++++
>>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/btrfs_cmds.c b/btrfs_cmds.c
>> index f2b6355..699d9b0 100644
>> --- a/btrfs_cmds.c
>> +++ b/btrfs_cmds.c
>> @@ -964,6 +964,11 @@ int do_set_default_subvol(int nargs, char **argv)
>>               fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: invalid tree id (%s)\n",subvolid);
>>               return 30;
>>       }
>> +
>> +     /* Using the original root fs tree */
>> +     if (objectid == 0ULL) {
>> +             objectid = BTRFS_FS_TREE_OBJECTID;
>> +     }
>>       ret = ioctl(fd, BTRFS_IOC_DEFAULT_SUBVOL, &objectid);
>>       e = errno;
>>       close(fd);
>
>
> Seems that you're using an old btrfs-prog source code, now the file is 
> cmds-subvolume.c
>
> And also checkpatch.pl complains about style errors while checking this.
>
> thanks,
> liubo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to