On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 15:38:41 +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 01:53:28PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote: >> But I'm not sure these two bugs is the same, so I need the test tool >> of David to look into it. > > Attached. It's a set of scripts and has a few assumptions hardcoded, > like where the tar srouce is and the name of extracted directory, so > it'll need a few tweaks. Also the actions are started inside a tmux > session for convenience. > > The expected stress load is to generate lots of files and directories, > snapshot create and delete and rm of the untarred directory. The 'rm' > step is delayed a few minutes so the tar generates enough data. On some > hosts the rm phase is fast and will clean the untar directory too > quickly.
Thanks. I find this bug you reported is not introduced by my patch, it is a old bug. I have sent a RFC patch, I'll be very appreciated if you can get any comment. Regards Miao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
