Hi,

a few minor style comments,

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 06:11:14PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -5993,10 +5993,24 @@ unlock:
>        * in the case of read we need to unlock only the end area that we
>        * aren't using if there is any left over space.
>        */
> -     if (lockstart < lockend)
> -             clear_extent_bit(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lockstart, lockend,
> -                              unlock_bits, 1, 0, &cached_state, GFP_NOFS);
> -     else
> +     if (lockstart < lockend) {
> +             if (create && len < lockend - lockstart) {
> +                     clear_extent_bit(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lockstart,
> +                                      lockstart + len - 1, unlock_bits, 1, 0,
> +                                      &cached_state, GFP_NOFS);
> +                     /*
> +                      * Beside unlock, we also need to cleanup reserved space
> +                      * for the left range by attaching EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING.
> +                      */
> +                     clear_extent_bit(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree,
> +                                      lockstart + len, lockend, unlock_bits |
> +                                      EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, 1, 0, NULL,

I'd prefer to see unlock_bits and the new value on one line

> +                                      GFP_NOFS);
> +             } else

add { ... } around this

> +                     clear_extent_bit(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lockstart,
> +                                      lockend, unlock_bits, 1, 0,
> +                                      &cached_state, GFP_NOFS);
> +     } else

here too

>               free_extent_state(cached_state);
>  
>       free_extent_map(em);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to