On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:12:50PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> The ordered extent allocation is in the fast path of the IO, so use a slab
> to improve the speed of the allocation.

Good. Size of the struct is 280, so this will fall into the size-512
bucket, giving 8 objects per page, while own slab will pack 14 objects
into a page.

Another benefit I see is to check for leaked objects when the
module is removed (and the cache destroy takes place).

> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h |    2 ++
>  fs/btrfs/super.c        |    9 ++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> index 2eb79cc..a07ae77 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> @@ -958,3 +960,20 @@ void btrfs_add_ordered_operation(struct 
> btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>       }
>       spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->ordered_extent_lock);
>  }
> +
> +int __init ordered_data_init(void)
> +{
> +     ordered_extent_cache = kmem_cache_create("ordered_extent",

Please use the 'btrfs_' prefix, ie. 'btrfs_ordered_extent'

> +                             sizeof(struct btrfs_ordered_extent), 0,
> +                             SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT | SLAB_MEM_SPREAD,
> +                             NULL);
> +     if (!ordered_extent_cache)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to