On 10/03/2012 05:01 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
"Type" for the first column is probably enough.
Why is the third column called Chunk-size? If my understanding is
correct, it's just a break down of Disk_allocated from the summary
section. If so, why not call it Disk_allocated to avoid confusion?
Using everywhere Disk_<something> was my first attempt. But after some
thoughts I decided that these are two different kind of information. It
is true that Disk_allocated is the sum of Chunk-Sizes... But my feels is
that this is a kind of "implementation details". If some other type of
allocation unit will be added to BTRFS, then these will be added to
Disk_allocated, but not to Chunk list...
I prefer to not change the wording until an enough critical mass of
people converge to a unique solution .
Also, why do you use dashes instead of underbars for table headers?
Yes, also Hugo noticed that.
Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
