Am Samstag, 27. Oktober 2012 schrieb Michael Kjörling: > On 27 Oct 2012 18:43 +0200, from [email protected] (Martin Steigerwald): > > Possibly this could be done tabular as well, like: > > > > vdb vdc vdd > > > > Data, RAID 0 307,25MB 307,25MB 307,25MB > > … > > System,RAID1 - 8MB 8MB > > … > > Unused 2,23GB 2,69GB 2,24GB > > > > > > > > I like this. But what if the filesystem has 100 disks? > > Maybe I'm just not familiar enough with btrfs yet to punch an > immediate hole in the idea, but how about pivoting that table? Columns > for data values ("data, raid 0", "system, raid 1", "unused", ...) and > rows for the underlying devices? Something like this, copying the > numbers from your example. And I'm using colon here rather than comma, > because I believe that it better captures the intent. > > Data: RAID 0 System: RAID 1 Unused > /dev/vdb 307.25 MB - 2.23 GB > /dev/vdc 307.25 MB 8 MB 2.69 GB > /dev/vdd 307.25 MB 8 MB 2.24 GB > ============ ============== ============ > TOTAL 921.75 MB 16 MB 7.16 GB
Hmmm, good idea. I like it this way around. It would scale better with the number of drives and there is a good way to place the totals. I wonder about how to possibly include the used part of each tree. With mostly 5 columns it might be doable. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
