On Dec 24, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli <kreij...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Chrism > > On 12/23/2012 10:11 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm not completely sure if this is a wipefs bug, or a btrfs(-progs) >> bug. The gist is that after using wipefs on a btrfs formatted >> partition, then reformatted as ext4, mount sees it as ext4, parted >> sees it as ext4, but I btrfs fi show sees it as a member device of a >> btrfs volume. I have filed a bug against util-linux, but perhaps this >> is a btrfs-progs over confidence in what it thinks is a valid volume. >> I have included in the bug report the first 5MB of the device. >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889888 > > I cannot reproduce this behaviour [1]. However I have to point out that > this [2][3] patch solved a problem like you reported. > > Which version of btrfs-progs do you have ? It seems that F18 (beta) > already has the latest btrfs-progs suite.. This happens with the current F18 test candidates, which have btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20121017git91d9eec-1.fc18 Chris Murphy-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
