If we have an ordered extent before the ordered extent we are currently
completing that is after the current disk_i_size we will put our i_size
update into that ordered extent so that we do not expose stale data.  The
problem is that if our disk i_size is updated past the previous ordered
extent we won't update the i_size with the pending i_size update.  So check
the pending i_size update and if its above the current disk i_size we need
to go ahead and try to update.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jba...@fusionio.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c |   11 +++++++++--
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
index cbd4838..c447e4c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
@@ -895,9 +895,16 @@ int btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(struct inode *inode, u64 
offset,
         * if the disk i_size is already at the inode->i_size, or
         * this ordered extent is inside the disk i_size, we're done
         */
-       if (disk_i_size == i_size || offset <= disk_i_size) {
+       if (disk_i_size == i_size)
+               goto out;
+
+       /*
+        * We still need to update disk_i_size if outstanding_isize is greater
+        * than disk_i_size.
+        */
+       if (offset <= disk_i_size &&
+           (!ordered || ordered->outstanding_isize < disk_i_size))
                goto out;
-       }
 
        /*
         * walk backward from this ordered extent to disk_i_size.
-- 
1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to