This idea is from ext4. By this patch, we can make the dio write parallel,
and improve the performance. But because we can not update isize without
i_mutex, the unlocked dio write just can be done in front of the EOF.
We needn't worry about the race between dio write and truncate, because the
truncate need wait untill all the dio write end.
And we also needn't worry about the race between dio write and punch hole,
because we have extent lock to protect our operation.
I ran fio to test the performance of this feature.
== Hardware ==
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7500 @ 2.93GHz
Mem: 2GB
SSD: Intel X25-M 120GB (Test Partition: 60GB)
== config file ==
[global]
ioengine=psync
direct=1
bs=4k
size=32G
runtime=60
directory=/mnt/btrfs/
filename=testfile
group_reporting
thread
[file1]
numjobs=1 # 2 4
rw=randwrite
== result (KBps) ==
write 1 2 4
lock 24936 24738 24726
nolock 24962 30866 32101
== result (iops) ==
write 1 2 4
lock 6234 6184 6181
nolock 6240 7716 8025
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <mi...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
Changelog v1 -> v2:
- don't do nolocked DIO write if it is beyond the EOF
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index a49be05..2948123 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -6622,28 +6622,36 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb
*iocb,
struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
size_t count = 0;
int flags = 0;
- bool wakeup = false;
+ bool wakeup = true;
+ bool relock = false;
ssize_t ret;
if (check_direct_IO(BTRFS_I(inode)->root, rw, iocb, iov,
offset, nr_segs))
return 0;
+ atomic_inc(&inode->i_dio_count);
+ smp_mb__after_atomic_inc();
+
if (rw & WRITE) {
count = iov_length(iov, nr_segs);
+ /*
+ * If the write DIO is beyond the EOF, we need update
+ * the isize, but it is protected by i_mutex. So we can
+ * not unlock the i_mutex at this case.
+ */
+ if (offset + count <= inode->i_size) {
+ mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
+ relock = true;
+ }
ret = btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space(inode, count);
if (ret)
- return ret;
- } else {
- atomic_inc(&inode->i_dio_count);
- smp_mb__after_atomic_inc();
- if (unlikely(test_bit(BTRFS_INODE_READDIO_NEED_LOCK,
- &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags))) {
- inode_dio_done(inode);
- flags = DIO_LOCKING | DIO_SKIP_HOLES;
- } else {
- wakeup = true;
- }
+ goto out;
+ } else if (unlikely(test_bit(BTRFS_INODE_READDIO_NEED_LOCK,
+ &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags))) {
+ inode_dio_done(inode);
+ flags = DIO_LOCKING | DIO_SKIP_HOLES;
+ wakeup = false;
}
ret = __blockdev_direct_IO(rw, iocb, inode,
@@ -6662,8 +6670,11 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb
*iocb,
}
btrfs_delalloc_release_metadata(inode, 0);
}
+out:
if (wakeup)
inode_dio_done(inode);
+ if (relock)
+ mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
return ret;
}
--
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
