In start_transactio(), we will try to join the transaction again after
the current transaction is committed, so we should not release the
reserved space of the qgroup. Fix it.

Cc: Arne Jansen <sensi...@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <mi...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/transaction.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
index fc03aa6..bc2f2d1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ again:
        h->block_rsv = NULL;
        h->orig_rsv = NULL;
        h->aborted = 0;
-       h->qgroup_reserved = qgroup_reserved;
+       h->qgroup_reserved = 0;
        h->delayed_ref_elem.seq = 0;
        h->type = type;
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&h->qgroup_ref_list);
@@ -401,6 +401,7 @@ again:
                h->block_rsv = &root->fs_info->trans_block_rsv;
                h->bytes_reserved = num_bytes;
        }
+       h->qgroup_reserved = qgroup_reserved;
 
 got_it:
        btrfs_record_root_in_trans(h, root);
-- 
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to