In start_transactio(), we will try to join the transaction again after the current transaction is committed, so we should not release the reserved space of the qgroup. Fix it.
Cc: Arne Jansen <sensi...@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <mi...@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c index fc03aa6..bc2f2d1 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ again: h->block_rsv = NULL; h->orig_rsv = NULL; h->aborted = 0; - h->qgroup_reserved = qgroup_reserved; + h->qgroup_reserved = 0; h->delayed_ref_elem.seq = 0; h->type = type; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&h->qgroup_ref_list); @@ -401,6 +401,7 @@ again: h->block_rsv = &root->fs_info->trans_block_rsv; h->bytes_reserved = num_bytes; } + h->qgroup_reserved = qgroup_reserved; got_it: btrfs_record_root_in_trans(h, root); -- 1.6.5.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html