On 02/25/2013 10:25 PM, Suman C wrote:
Thanks for the sparse file idea, I am actually using that solution
already. I am not sure if its the best way, however.
(Sorry to respond to such an old thread.)
Hi Suman,
I think zvol-like functionality would be very nice for btrfs to have. It
would be more natural to manage btrvols than looped-back files I think,
and removing those sw layers may also increase performance, but who
knows by how much. It would let btrfs really act as "just" the LVM, if
desired.
Do we have any sense for how much work adding this would be?
Regards -- Andy
p.s. some interesting stuff on zvols
http://pthree.org/2012/12/21/zfs-administration-part-xiv-zvols/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
