On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:18 PM, David Sterba <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 06:08:29PM +0100, Filipe David Manana wrote: >> Is there any reason why the btrfs progs (except for btrfs-show-super) >> don't validate the super block's checksum? > > btrfsck accepts broken filesystems, so open_ctree_broken should possibly > detect but skip the checksum mismatch.
So, when running btrfsck just report if there's a super block checksum mismatch (like the patch does) but use it (don't skip it). For any other tools in btrfs-progs just report the mismatch and skip to the next super block (like what the patch does now) ? thanks > > david -- Filipe David Manana, "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
