On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 07:49:53PM +0100, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote: > The module cmds-restore.c was defining its own next_leaf() > function, which did exactly the same as btrfs_next_leaf() > from ctree.c.
This has been removed by Eric's patch present in the integration branches: Btrfs-progs: remove cut & paste btrfs_next_leaf from restore http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg24477.html but now Chris has a fix in the master branch, btrfs-restore: deal with NULL returns from read_node_slot https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git/commit/?id=194aa4a1bd6447bb545286d0bcb0b0be8204d79f the code of updated next_leaf is not identical to btrfs_next_leaf and I think 'restore' could be more tolerant to partially corrupted structures, so both functions could make sense in the end. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
