On Mon, July 29, 2013 at 17:32 (+0200), BJ Quinn wrote: > Thanks for the response! Not sure I want to roll a custom kernel on this > particular system. Any idea on when it might make it to 3.10 stable or > 3.11? Or should I just revert back to 3.9?
I missed that it's in fact in 3.11 and if I got Liu Bo right he's going to send it to 3.10 stable soon. Thanks, -Jan > Thanks! > > -BJ > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jan Schmidt" <list.bt...@jan-o-sch.net> > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 3:21:51 AM > > Hi BJ, > > [original message rewrapped] > > On Thu, July 25, 2013 at 18:32 (+0200), BJ Quinn wrote: >> (Apologies for the double post -- forgot to send as plain text the first >> time >> around, so the list rejected it.) >> >> I see that there's now a btrfs send / receive and I've tried using it, but >> I'm getting the oops I've pasted below, after which the FS becomes >> unresponsive (no I/O to the drive, no CPU usage, but all attempts to access >> the FS results in a hang). I have an internal drive (single drive) that >> contains 82GB of compressed data with a couple hundred snapshots. I tried >> taking the first snapshot and making a read only copy (btrfs subvolume >> snapshot -r) and then I connected an external USB drive and ran btrfs send / >> receive to that external drive. It starts working and gets a couple of GB in >> (I'd expect the first snapshot to be about 20GB) and then gets the following >> error. I had to use the latest copy of btrfs-progs from git, because the >> package installed on my system (btrfs-progs-0.20-0.2.git91d9eec) simply >> returned "invalid argument" when trying to run btrfs send / receive. Thanks >> in advance for any info you may have. > > The problem has been introduced with rbtree ulists in 3.10, commit > > Btrfs: add a rb_tree to improve performance of ulist search > > You should be safe to revert that commit, it's a performance optimization > attempt. Alternatively, you can apply the published fix > > Btrfs: fix crash regarding to ulist_add_merge > > It has not made it into 3.10 stable or 3.11, yet, but is contained in Josef's > btrfs-next > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next.git > > Thanks, > -Jan > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
