On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Chris Mason <chris.ma...@fusionio.com> wrote: > The problem with the progs release is I keep finding more things I want > to add. My local git tree has about a dozen commits that I feel are > important enough for v1.0. I just have to cut it, the distros and > others are completely correct in asking for an official release.
I know this feeling too well. In order to just "get something out", it might make sense to just do some time-based releases every now and again (and maybe call them 0.X, rather than 1.0 until you are happy). Even the occasional (maybe after each kernel release) git tag (without actually creating tarballs etc) would be very helpful, as at least we would have a common reference point for bug reports and similar (and after all, numbers are cheap ;-)). >From your point of view, having frequent releases will also (I suppose) be helpful as it will make sure your users/testers are using the most recent version (at least in Arch, whatever you tag we will ship within a few days) and hence you won't have to ask them to rebuild from git to make sure the bug hasn't already been fixed. > In terms of the quality of the commits, I only put things into the > master branch of the git tree that I have fully confidence in. Thanks for the info Chris, this is useful to know. I'll keep pushing git snapshots then (but as I said, tags would be better). -t -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
